If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Death Penalty-Pros and Cons. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Death Penalty-Pros and Cons paper right on time.
Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Death Penalty-Pros and Cons, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Death Penalty-Pros and Cons paper at affordable prices !
Against the death penalty (cons)
Many people think that capital punishment is a brutal, antiquated concept that must be abolished in the
name of civilized society. In the United States, dozens of people are put to death. The death penalty
exercises only the most primal instincts to kill and extract revenge in an organized fashion. Many
people think that the death penalty should be abolished entirely because it will allow society to function
in a civilized manner in which every person has the right to live. People also think that capitol
punishment is hypocritical, selection is arbitrary and biased, and the practice itself is cruel and inhumane.
By allowing the organized extermination of living human beings the government is telling the public that
they have the right to extinguish anyone they think is a murderer.
Society today thinks that race, social and economic status, level of education, and location of crime are
key in the selection of those to be executed. The fate of one man's life often depends on the whims and
prejudgments of the jury he is granted. A statistic shows that in 176 only five white persons have been
executed for killing a black person. This tells the public that the value of their lives depends on their
race and the jury's opinion of them. If this is true then that would mean that this sets back years of
struggle for civil rights in the North America.
The enforcement of capital punishment is a sadistic and macabre activity which appeals to the more
grim aspects of human nature, wrath and malice. The condemned is told of his or her execution date
and is then confined in a maximum security prison to await his or her execution. "For there to be an
equivalence between criminal homicide and execution," Albert Camus wrote, "the death penalty would
have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a horrible
death on him and who from that moment onward had confined him at his mercy for months. Such a
monster is not encountered in private life." The execution, once arrived at after years of waiting in fear,
is brutal and primitive. Killing someone is not quite as simple as switching on a light. It requires violent
trauma that eventually stops the brain from functioning one way or another. The five methods used in
the United States are electrocution, hanging, poisoning, gassing, and even shooting. The process is
never as clean and efficient as a humane death should be and occasionally, things go wrong. Most of
the time, those executed are fitted with a hood to spare spectators the gruesome contortions of pain
the face undergoes, and allows them to view the person as more of an object.
The main argument against capital punishment is cost. It is a documented fact, however, that the cost
of a capital trial combined with the jail term and execution is exorbitantly more expensive than
supporting the prisoner for the rest of half of his life in jail. In fact, in many cases it has been 00%
to 400% more costly.
Some say that the fact that capital punishment has survived thus far is due primarily to the fact that it
appeals to man's bloodlust and need for revenge. While civilized law in the United States has stated it
wrong to simply kill someone deemed "deserving", it has not stated it wrong for the government to kill
those deemed "deserving". Society's integrity is diminished every time a criminal is executed. A lot of
people think that the mentality that encourages organized murder in the name of justice is doomed to
devour the society that supports it, creating a totalitarian culture governed by paranoia. Society must
voice its opposition to capital punishment before it pays dearly for it.
For the death penalty (pros)
There is no way on can tell whether the death penalty deters murderers from killing. The argument
goes on that proponents of capital punishments should not have to bear the burden of proving
deterrence by a reasonable doubt. Nor should the abolitionist have to prove deterrence by a
reasonable doubt. Neither side would be able to anyway.
A criminal on death row has a chance to prepare his death, make a will, and make his last statements,
etc. while most victims can never do it. There are many other crimes where people are injured by
stabbing, rape, theft, etc. To some degree at least, the victims right to freedom and pursuit of happiness
is violated.
When the assailant is apprehended and charged, he has the power of the judicial process who protects
his constitutional rights. What about the victim? The assailant may have compassion from investigating
officers, families, and friends. Furthermore, the criminal may have organized campaigns of propaganda
to build sympathy for him as if he is the one who has been sinned against. These false claims are
publicized, for no reason, hence, protecting the criminal.
In arguments of the death penalty, there are two lives to think about. Too much emphasis is placed on
the convicted murderer, the one being executed, and the victim is all forgotten.
One reason why I support the death penalty is because millions are being killed and will be killed
because our justice system is not working. Millions have already been killed and will be killed every
year. According to Time Magazine, there are ,000,000 people beaten in the United States. Some
are knifed, shot, or assaulted. Crime growth has been going up in the past because of too much
leniency going hand in hand with the increased rate of people being victimized. There are many loop
holes devised for offenders, and because of that crime rate has increased drastically. Between 160
and 168 crime rate increased 11 times. More and more people are being murdered, raped,
assaulted, kidnaped, and robbed, etc.
When you commit a felony, it is a matter of free will. No one is compelled to commit armed robbery,
murder, or rape. The average citizen does not have a mind or intentions to become a killer or being
falsely accused of murder. What he is worried about is being a victim.
Opponents argue that there is no deterrent effect by using the death penalty. According to Bailey, who
did a study from 167 to 168, the death penalty was a deterrent in 7 states. When there was a
moratorium on capital punishment in the United States, the study showed murder rates increased by
100%. The study also reviewed 14 nations who abolished the death penalty, claimed murder increased
by 7% from five years before the abolition period to the five years after the abolition.
The number of years on the average spent on death row is 10 years, which I believe is to long. It is
known, will all the appeals, the death penalty is not swift. In fact, most murderers feel they most likely
will never be put to death. If the death penalty was swift and inevitable, there certainly would be a
decrease in homicide rates. Most people have a natural fear of death. It is a trait man have to think
about what will happen before we act. If every murderer who killed someone died instantly, the
homicide rate would be very low because no one likes to die. We cannot do this, but if the justice
system can make it more swift and severe, we could change the laws to make capital punishment faster
and make appeals a shorter process.
Many opponents claim lots of innocent man are wrongly executed. There has never been any proof
of an innocent man being executed. A study by Bedau-Radlet claimed there were cases where the
defendant have been wrongfully executed. However, this study is controversial. Studies like Markman
and Cassell find that the methodology was flawed in 1 cases. There was no substantial evidence of
guilt, and no evidence of innocense. Moreover, our judicial system takes extra precautions to be sure
the innocent and their rights are protected. Most likely an innocent person would not be executed.
The question is whether or not execution of an innocent person is strong enough to abolish the death
penalty. The death penalty saves lives. Repeat murders are eliminated and foreseeable murders are
deterred. You must consider the victim as well as the defendant.
Some say that the State is like a murder himself. The argument here is, if execution is murder, than
killing someone in war is murder. Our country should stop fighting wars. On the contrary, is it
necessary to protect the rights of a group of people. Hence, the death penalty is vital to protect a
person's right to live. Is arresting someone the same as kidnaping someone? In the same, executing
someone is not murder, it is punishment by society for a deserving criminal.
The death penalty is important because it could save the lives of thousands of potential victims who are
at stake.
Please note that this sample paper on Death Penalty-Pros and Cons is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Death Penalty-Pros and Cons, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on Death Penalty-Pros and Cons will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
